Business Architecture
Business Architecture
It is more than 30 years ago since John Zachman in 1982 first mentioned Enterprise Architecture in the public domain. Since then, various different enterprise architecture frameworks (EA frameworks) as well as business architecture concepts have been developed. At present, there is a tremendous proliferation of such business architecture concepts; a docent are in current or recent use, and new ones are being created. Business Architects are architecting organizations and enterprises need ways to understand, choose and adapt strategy concepts, business modelling and business transformation into their business architecture frameworks.
Together with the Global University Alliance (GUA) the standards organizations ISO, IEEE, CSIR, LEADing Practice and OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group and the OMG Academia & Research Working Group, intend to solicit information and research into basis for the comparison, assessment, and selection of business architecture concepts and their evolution as a practice matures.
Research Focus
Information and research is sought on topics related to the understanding and comparison of Business Architecture Frameworks (BAFs), including, but not limited to:
- Semantic foundations of Business Architecture Frameworks
- What common Ontology aspects do the various Business Architecture concepts have?
- What common meta objects do they these Business Architecture concepts have?
- What common templates/models do the Business Architecture concepts have?
- Organization and modularization principles of their Business Architecture concepts
- Extension and customization mechanisms for Business Architecture
- Comparing Business Architecture method and approaches for comparison
- What Business Architecture roles exist
- Concern-oriented Business Architecture considerations:
- What are the most common business architecture customer concerns?
- What concerns are well-supported (typical concerns tackled by Business Architecture concepts)?
- What concerns are not currently handled?
- Model and viewpoint considerations:
- Typical Business Architecture models the organizations work with?
- What challenges are being addressed by current Business Architecture models?
- What challenges are not being addressed by current Business Architecture models?
- What are the tasks for Business Architecture models used?
- Business Architecture LifeCycle considerations:
- Which concepts have Business Architecture LifeCycle aspects
- What are the Business Architecture LifeCycle phases
- What are the Business Architecture LifeCycle tasks
- What are the Business Architecture LifeCycle roles and which task do they do in the various phases
- Business Architecture KPI considerations:
- Which Business Architecture measures (KPIs) exist
- Which framework, method or approach have Business Architecture measures
- What is the relationship between Business Architecture measures and lifecycle
- Tool support:
- Which Business Architecture Tool exist
- Which framework, method or approach have Business Architecture Tools
- What is the relationship between Business Architecture Tool method and lifecycle
Examples of research findings can be found here:
- Business Architecture Framework Overview
- Business Architecture Analysis
- Business Architecture Taxonomy
- The 25 most common Business Architecture Artifacts
Baseline For Research
As a basis for the research we will base it on the international standard uniformity and interoperability, we adopt the conceptual model established in ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010, Systems and software engineering — Architecture description, as a foundation for exploring architecture frameworks, defined as follows:
Architecture Framework: conventions, principles and practices for the description of architectures established within a specific domain of application and/or community of stakeholders.
Following the ISO/IEC/IEEE Standard, an architecture framework should be specified by:[1]
- information identifying the framework;
- one or more concerns;
- one or more stakeholders having those concerns;
- one or more architecture viewpoints (and their specifications);
- correspondence rules, integrating the viewpoints;
- conditions on applicability;
- relationship with the provisions of the ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 conceptual model (“meta model”).[2]
Developing & Applying Business Architecture (Part 1) Webinar
Research Team
The Business Architecture research team and contacts are:
Research Leader:
Prof. Mark von Rosing
ISO 42010 Development Member
Global University Alliance, Chairman
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group, Co-Chair
OMG Academia & Research Working Group, Chair
Fred Cummins
OMG, Business Modeling & Integration Task Force, Chairman
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group, Co-Chair
Prof. Antonio Margarito
University of Salento
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group: OMG standards that are BA relevant
Prof. Maxim Arzumanyan
Business Architecture Roles
OMG Academia & Research Working Group, Co-Chair
Global University Alliance, Co-Chair
Prof. Sjir Nijssen
PNA Group
OMG Academia & Research Working Group, member
Global University Alliance, member
Prof. Wim Laurier
Business Architecture Ontology
Global University Alliance, Co-Chairman
Prof. Simon Polovina
Business Architecture Semantics (relations and rules)
Global University Alliance, Co-Chairman
Prof. Hans Scheruhn
Typical Business Architecture models
Global University Alliance, Co-Chairman
Thierry Boissay
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group: Syntax Analysis
Henk DeMan
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group: Value Model
OMG VDML Chairman
Denis Gagne
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group: Case Modelling
OMG Case Management Model Notations, Chairman
Gagan Saxena
OMG Business Architecture Special Interest Group: Decision Model and Notation
OMG Decision Model and Notation SIG
Decision Management Solutions
CSIR Coordinator:
Rentia Barnard
Research Institute CSIR, Enterprise Architect Research Group Leader
Georg Etzel
LEADing Practice, Co-CEO
John A. Zachman
Inventor and Father of Enterprise Architecture, Zachman International
NATO Coordinators:
Johan Goossens
NATO Allied Command Transformation
Branch Head, Technology & Human Factors
Krzysztof Skurzak
NATO C3 Architecture & Design
Peter Woudsma
NATO C3 Technology Innovation
UNESCO Coordinators:
Dr. Selin N. Şenocak
UNESCO Chair Holder
Cultural Diplomacy, Governance and Education
Director, Occidental Studies Applied Research Center
Political Sciences and International Relations Faculty Member
Ulrik Foldager
Business Architecture KPIs
LEADing Practice, researcher
Architecture Viewpoints
[1] Survey of Architecture Frameworks.
[2] See ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010, Clause 6.